thechristchurchfiasco

"Shifting the Balance of Power in the insurance industry – back to the policyholders! "

Insurers Tend to Escalate Claims When The Media Gets Involved!

1 Comment

Still Experiencing Issues with Your Insurance Claim?

4 YEARS ON

 IS YOUR HOME STILL BEING ASSESSED? IS YOUR HOME POORLY REPAIRED?

ARE YOU STILL IN LIMBO?

ARE YOU ISOLATED, FRUSTRATED, STRESSED?

 

4th September 2014 6:00pm to 7:30pm

Shirley Boys High School

 

 JOHN CAMPBELL BROADCASTING LIVE

“We are inviting people with unresolved earthquake claims to come along. It will be a good way of getting a feel for how the recovery is going and how many people are still having issues with EQC or/and their insurance companies”.

 “So far over 200 people have officially registered (registration is not a requirement to attend).  It is expected that significantly more than that will show up on the night.

If you are a homeowner planning to attend it would be helpful if you could print a copy of the relevant logo of the insurer that has not repaired your home.  Some copies will be available on Thursday if you cannot do this in advance.” Melanie Tobeck.

If you know of anyone that is still awaiting a repair or rebuild then please encourage them to come along.

Logos

 

 Willing To Share Your Stories  4th September 2014 FOR ALL EARTHQUAKE CLAIMANTS Registration Optionalhttp://4September2014.eventbrite.co.nzorSHOW UP ON THE NIGHT

 

 

Author: Sarah Miles

Trained as a lawyer, psychotherapist and mediator. My goal is to make my voice heard for the causes in which I believe so as to improve and contribute to a more sustainable and equitable society. I believe in the enormous power of the human spirit and the power within each of us to effect major change. "The only triumph over evil is for good men [and women] to do nothing". https://thechristchurchfiasco.wordpress.com/

One thought on “Insurers Tend to Escalate Claims When The Media Gets Involved!

  1. Hi Sarah
    Not sure I can make the meeting but if not the following general issues are worth raising if you get to say a piece.
    1) Insurers require the insured to prove their loss and I expect most insured have been required to do this in respect of contents claims, but material damage has been hijacked by insurers. I consider this to be a breach of contract in terms of the shonky SOW’s produced and the insistence on using the insurers nominated PM/builder, in the Ridgecrest case one SC judge pointed out that the IAG policy stated – “if you (the insure repair we (the insurer) will pay ” so the insurer has no right of appointment of PM or Builder. 2) Damages – the Judge in the Rout case declined an award partially due to the inability to show a financial loss, however the employment court frequently awards damages for hurt feelings etc so I see no reason in a quake situation to differentiate. 3) )Next is interest on a late paid claim were the SC decisions in – Worldwide NZ LLC v NZ Venue and Event Management Limited establishes that interest is due on a debt and my understanding is that an insurance claim is the insurers liability which unpaid is a debt and in Ridgecrest is established as not merging in a total loss so in my view a Sept event claim of $500k would attract 5% interest for 4 years and a subsequent total loss of a house whose rebuild cost is $1m would incur interest for 3+ years so insurers become liable for $1.5m + interest. The further point here is that insurers should now be more willing to settle early were interest may well exceed any perceived savings by delay or deceit. 4) Delay many insurers advised that they could not assess damage whilst Govt had not classified their land, in my view this is wrong and irrelevant as damage had to be assessed irrespective of land classification which largely affected if a house could be rebuilt on that land and if so what revised compliance regulation would have to be followed – morally some financial recognition should accorded in settlement. IAG recognize stress in a total loss situation by offering a payment of $2000 which in my view is a way of limiting their liability but proves their should be recognition.

    Like

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s