"Highlighting the inadequacies of the way in which the earthquakes of 2010-2012 were handled by the insurance industry! "

Natural Disasters Occur in a Political Space

1 Comment

Although there are those who would disagree, Natural Disasters are probably not driven by politics, but nor are they immune from politics. Far from it. The actions taken by human actors undoubtedly affect the prevention, mitigation, and damage of natural disasters and their aftermaths.SAM_1626

The ‘shock’ refers to the natural act itself e.g. the earthquake. The ‘aftershock’ comes later – this is why I made  reference to the ‘insurance aftershock’ in my book, The Christchurch Fiasco. It transpires that post the Christchurch earthquakes — EQC, CERA, the Christchurch City Council, and the Government of the day equate to the net impact of the ‘aftershock’ on the population – the physical ‘disaster’ is far from the whole event.  It is also made up of those shocking post disaster events, such as delayed insurance payouts, top-down authoritarian decisions, ineptitude of EQC, evidence of corruption in the post quake city – and the list goes on…

Though governments are supposed to care about the social welfare of their citizens, they also have an interest in maximizing government income. Though governments do spend on both preventative and palliative measures to lessen the impact of a potential natural shock, they also use natural disasters to redistribute power through the political effect, for example favouring disaster spending in regions that are politically aligned with the party in power. Dire circumstances provide rapacious governments with a stronger ability to increase their level of theft and to hide it. Arguably we are seeing that take place here in Christchurch. Disasters can be used as a blunt policy instrument to target or reward populations and to enrich a government and the ‘corporate classes’.

Interesting too, is the fact that a time of crisis can increase markedly the amount of information a population has about current or incumbent politicians and their governance style and outcomes. This is because disaster produces a highly informative environment where voters are continually debating and experiencing the performance and merits of the operators in power – be that a Prime Minister or a City Council. It is in these high information environments that voters learn enough to enable them to consider taking the decision to replace the political incumbents.

For example, certain incumbents in Christchurch are currently responsible for rebuilding a city infrastructure and restoring the lives of affected communities to some semblance of order. During normal times there is usually little information about how good a job the incumbent did or is doing, but during an earthquake or hurricane voters quickly learn a lot more about whether the incumbent has done a good job and who these people actually are. When there is this much information floating around, information about performance may become sufficiently informative to overcome a voter’s initial tendency to support an incumbent. Their likelihood of re-election by the persons of the affected area therefore has the potential to take a hammering.  And the truth is that as voters we often understand little beyond our own or our local community’s pain and pleasure. . .  as voters we often have only a vague, or at worst primitive understanding of the connections between incumbent politicians actions and our own pain or pleasure. Governments also rely on national media disinterest (or control) to ensure that populations outside the affected area get to hear little of their manipulations within the area.

From where I’m sitting, the National Government won’t be getting my vote in the next election. I hear that from many other people too. Educated voters are fully rational, and guess what –  re-election rates are lower for incumbents following natural disasters. The mechanism is informational. A rational voter votes retrospectively — i.e. based on what they perceive to be the past performance of the incumbent—but does so only because that past performance is informative about expected future performance. So look out National, if you want the Canterbury vote you’ll have to do better than the current lack lustre performance.  An example of this is the long awaited insurance advocacy service which was mooted over ten months ago. (See  The month of May will now see the introduction of a service which is said to help those with “the most complex problems”. (See The service will not be an advocacy service which is what residents have been calling for. (See

There will be many votes in Canterbury the Government will not be able to count on come election time.

~Future Proofing for a sustainable, participatory, democratic society.KiwiSure

If you would like to contribute a post on this topic then see Guest Archives.

Author: Sarah-Alice Miles

Love to write, create and watch the clouds move across the sky - these days in the Netherlands. 'Art allows us to find ourselves and lose ourselves at the same time'.

One thought on “Natural Disasters Occur in a Political Space

  1. Political accidents are much like Aviation ones in that it is seldom a single action or event that causes the crash, frequently five compounding errors are needed so where does our current government stand in the error stakes. John Key & The GCSB/Kim Dotcom is very serious as National rely so much on John Keys past popularity. Gerry Brownlee and his management or mismanagement of Cera/Eqc and his perceived arrogant dismissal of Christchurch electors plight in insurance settlement and the associated & extended period of personal discomfort and stress will not be forgotten easily. The clear hostility between a dysfunctional city council and government is being viewed as evidence of incompetence and indifference to the need of Christchurch citizens by both. The removal of democracy and failure to re instate as promised over E Can is seen as dictatorial and and an offense to democracy – no taxation without representation. Finally the oppressive and secretive way CERA is compulsorily acquiring land on their terms at their price with no real negotiation based on disclosure of the basis of valuation is also dictatorial and can only result in distrust and loss of investment evidenced by the departure of Angus McFarlane a past significant & sucessful investor in Christchurch who now sees his future in Texas. Hekia Parata is a walking disaster and messing with Education (Children) and Health has historically been a sure path to the opposition benches next election. I write this as constructive criticism as the thought of a Labour/Greens/Mana coalition is a path to economic penury and National in facilitating this by failing to listen to the voter will be as responsible as the opposition politicians of such coalition.


Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s